<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Richard Gordon Is the Best Presidentiable for 2010	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010</link>
	<description>I seek to empower people by giving them something to ponder.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 04:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Why the Senate Needs More Dick &#124; Marcial&#039;s Law		</title>
		<link>https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/#comment-58</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why the Senate Needs More Dick &#124; Marcial&#039;s Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 04:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-58</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/2015/12/14/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/ [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/2015/12/14/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/2015/12/14/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Is Sen. Richard Gordon Corrupt? &#124; Marcial&#039;s Law		</title>
		<link>https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/#comment-57</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Sen. Richard Gordon Corrupt? &#124; Marcial&#039;s Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-57</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ni Noynoy Aquino (Leonardo Ruelan Dosdos) ay hango sa nauna kong blog na pinamagatang &#8220;Why Richard Gordon Is The Best Presidentiable for 2010.&#8221; Tinatalakay nito ang ang usaping kung tiwali o hindi si Gordon sa gitna ng katotohanang [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ni Noynoy Aquino (Leonardo Ruelan Dosdos) ay hango sa nauna kong blog na pinamagatang &#8220;Why Richard Gordon Is The Best Presidentiable for 2010.&#8221; Tinatalakay nito ang ang usaping kung tiwali o hindi si Gordon sa gitna ng katotohanang [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Of SCOOTERS, JEEPNEYS, BUSES, and AIRPLANES: A Simple Case Against Gibo, Noynoy, and Manny Villar for President in 2010 &#124; Marcial&#039;s Law		</title>
		<link>https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/#comment-56</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Of SCOOTERS, JEEPNEYS, BUSES, and AIRPLANES: A Simple Case Against Gibo, Noynoy, and Manny Villar for President in 2010 &#124; Marcial&#039;s Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-56</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] My Friends, applying the same basic criteria from the “driver” model to selecting a President clearly shows Gordon to be the more qualified candidate based on experience and expertise alone. Although this work focuses on executive experience as the primary defense for Gordon, issues of credibility and trustworthiness are addressed with a debate between a Noynoy supporter and I in my previous blog here. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] My Friends, applying the same basic criteria from the “driver” model to selecting a President clearly shows Gordon to be the more qualified candidate based on experience and expertise alone. Although this work focuses on executive experience as the primary defense for Gordon, issues of credibility and trustworthiness are addressed with a debate between a Noynoy supporter and I in my previous blog here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcial Bonifacio		</title>
		<link>https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/#comment-55</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcial Bonifacio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/#comment-54&quot;&gt;Sari Aya Malaya&lt;/a&gt;.

Maraming salamat. Sa totoo lang, I have decided to do precisely that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/#comment-54">Sari Aya Malaya</a>.</p>
<p>Maraming salamat. Sa totoo lang, I have decided to do precisely that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sari Aya Malaya		</title>
		<link>https://www.marcialslaw.com/why-richard-gordon-is-the-best-presidentiable-for-2010/#comment-54</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sari Aya Malaya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marcialslaw.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-54</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a very encouraging discussion...intellectually stimulating. In fact the argument alone would stand on its own as another blog post. Very interactive, Kudos!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very encouraging discussion...intellectually stimulating. In fact the argument alone would stand on its own as another blog post. Very interactive, Kudos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
